Russian punk band supporters expect little of legal appeal

MOSCOW (Reuters) - A Russian court's decision to hand two-year jail terms to punk band Pussy Riot for performing an anti-Kremlin song in Moscow's main cathedral prompted fury in the West and refocused attention on President Vladimir Putin's rights record.

But as a judge prepares to rule on Monday on an appeal filed by the three female jailed band members their legal team and their relatives hold out little hope that the sentences - which they believe were overly harsh - will be quashed or reduced.

"Such a decision is impossible," said Mark Feigin, a defense lawyer. "The courts are not independent and to imagine them making a decision based on the law would be a fantasy."

The case has damaged the Russian government's reputation in the West and raised awkward questions about its relationship with the Russian Orthodox Church, while the West's criticism has angered the Kremlin and irked many Russians who view the women as publicity-hungry provocateurs rather than freedom fighters.

The appeal ruling will have serious implications for the trio involved. Stanislav Samutsevich, father of Yekaterina Samutsevich, one of the three, never went for more than a month without seeing his only daughter before she was jailed.

In the seven months since she and the others were detained he has visited her in prison every other week and in court.

But if Monday's appeal fails to overturn the two-year jail sentence handed down to her and her two band mates for "hooliganism motivated by religious hatred" she will be sent to a distant prison colony and he will only be allowed rare visits.

He now spends his time surfing Internet forums to chat with other convict's relatives about prison conditions.

"When I last saw her on Friday, she complained about the lack of information. She was worried about how to react, about what will happen after the court," he told Reuters. "I was calming her down."

Opposition activists argue that the harsh sentences were personally ordered by Putin as part of a crackdown on dissent following his return to the presidency in May, an event foreshadowed by the biggest protests against the former KGB agent since he was first elected head of state in 2000.

Putin has repeatedly said he did not and will not interfere in the judicial process, though Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev has said he thinks the trio should be released.

LENIENCY?

Some saw Medvedev's comments as a sign that the trio may receive leniency but political analysts say he has little power to influence the appeal, and other moves suggest the Kremlin is in no mood to allow the women's release.

It has a limited incentive to do so. Although the West has criticized the verdict, opinion polls showed a majority of people in mainly Orthodox Christian Russia opposed the Pussy Riot protest, though fewer wanted tough jail sentences.

Parliament expelled an opposition leader from parliament earlier this month and has pushed through laws raising fines for protesters, stiffening punishment for defamation and tightening controls over foreign-funded lobby groups since May.

Another bill under consideration in parliament, where Putin's United Russia has a majority, would institute jail terms of up to three years for offending religious feelings.

Andrei Isayev, a party deputy from the ruling United Russia party, in his radio program this month called the women's conviction "just and humane" punishment for a performance he likened to "dancing on the graves of believers' relatives."

Samutsevich, 30, Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, 22, and 24-year-old Maria Alyokhina were sentenced on August 17, six months after criticizing Putin's close ties with the Russian Orthodox Church in a "punk prayer".

The trial exposed Putin to international criticism because of doubts over the independence of the judiciary, and global celebrities including British musician Paul McCartney, a former Beatle, and U.S. pop singer Madonna, called for leniency.

A Church statement after the verdict indicated that the clergy would back a pardon or a reduced sentence, but that would have required the women to admit their guilt. They have not done so.

They say their protest, in brightly-colored balaclavas, tights and short skirts, was not intended to offend believers and was motivated by anger over Putin's growing closeness to Patriarch Kirill, the head of the Russian Orthodox Church.

Kirill has called Putin's rule a "miracle of God" and backed his presidential election campaign this year. Kirill dismissed criticism of his backing for the Kremlin on Friday, telling students that close ties between the church and state helped protect and develop society.

But the debate over whether the three women should have been jailed has deepened a split in society to a degree rarely seen since the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991.

Soon after their trial, a group that took responsibility for the desecration of four wooden crosses that were chopped up in Russia said it was a protest against Pussy Riot's jailing.

A group of ultra-religious opponents of Pussy Riot has started organizing vigilante patrols at night in Moscow because its members fear the state cannot protect church property.

The bill criminalizing insults to religious sentiment could tighten the bonds between Putin and the Orthodox Church.

"The law is being drafted to protect the process of the merging of the church and state," rights activist Valery Borshev said. "It will be selectively applied to those who speak out."

(Additional reporting and writing by Alissa de Carbonnel; Editing by Andrew Osborn)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/russian-punk-band-supporters-expect-little-legal-appeal-172730206.html

piracy sopa marg helgenberger censorship wikipedia sopa and pipa bills censoring the internet

Locating A Devoted Webhosting Solution | My Six Strings Blog

With numerous people young and old seeking online websites in these modern day moments, there are a lot of that are not guaranteed which online internet hosting small business serves them very best. When you are one of the several lots of people hoping to get domain title registration, and less expensive web site internet hosting, you might be heading to acquire to glimpse out to get a couple of things which sound to plague the sector. Without the need of hunting into your next three matters, you can conclude up which includes a host that does not have your ideal pursuits in your mind.

* Prospect Program ? The very first thing that you just want from your world-wide-web internet hosting firm is excessive price of consumer assistance. Free of developing fantastic shopper program, you will not find a way to maneuver ahead with everything. It is a problematic matter that ought to be explored previously you indication around the dotted line, seeing that a multitude of know-how online businesses fall short to offer sufficient client help. Internet websites can go down at any supplied time, and when that comes about, you?re going to need to make confident that you simply can join which has a skilled, and that is the primary reason why you need marvelous shopper company, obtainable 24 hrs each day, seven times each week.

* Incentives ? You must see out for organisations that give very a large amount of incentives, quite than higher top quality word wide web internet hosting blueprints. Some enterprises have lackluster strategies, so to compensate, they provide out a variety of incentives that you simply may possibly or can potentially not have to have. They?re going to attempt to decorate all of them up with internet marketing speech, but that?s only designed to distract you extensive sufficient to acquire some thing on impulse, see out.

* Endless All the things ? 1 last-ditch work from lesser rated providers may be to give out limitless storage, unrestricted registrations, and endless bandwidth. Over the area this looks as if a terrific strategy, but once your web pages starts off to intrude concerning the shared local community that properties your website, you can get started with to receive billed a charge. That is suitable, in case you are far too preferred on the server, although the corporate claims endless entry, you might stop up needing to shell out out a great deal added for that overage. Never be fooled, if an organization supplies limitless internet hosting, and bandwidth, learn the okay print and do not get caught off guard.

The above mentioned three facts to hunt for will let you inside of the system of choosing the appropriate low-cost net internet hosting firm on your demands. Really don?t permit the above mentioned prevent you from developing your individual websites up and functioning. It will take time and energy to find the perfect host, sign-up the best title, and shift up inside of the technological innovation chain. Just take your time and effort choosing a good domain title, sign-up it which includes a respectable business enterprise, try to find an amount that matches your spending budget and strike the bottom jogging. The above mentioned will assist you to at the least make an informed determination with reference to internet hosting, as there are tons of enterprises available on the market endeavoring to fool new comers to signing up for insufficient blueprints. You shouldn?t in excess of increase your economic arm, if you do not ought huge finish internet hosting, then choose a shared internet hosting program that has a professional organisation. When unsure, learn comments from serious folks and generate a practical option.

Remember to explore to Revealing Top Secret Downsides Of Reasonable Internet Hosting at any time you need a whole lot more info around the topic.

Related posts:

  1. Globally Viable Webhosting Solution ? Information
  2. Less Expensive Hosts ? The Useful Solution to Save Cash On Website Hosting
  3. Very Affordable Website Hosting ? A Solution For That Compact And Medium Sized Enterprises
  4. Webhosting for Ones Not So Big Opportunity ? You Should Not Wait Around Any Longer
  5. Funds Hosting Features And Disadvantages: Notable Issues For Picking Out Webhosting Suppliers

Source: http://mysixstringsblog.com/locating-a-devoted-webhosting-solution/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=locating-a-devoted-webhosting-solution

breaking bad breaking bad food network star jeremy lin Sage Stallone Mermaid Body Found Celeste Holm

FM to review Income Tax dept's appeal-filing mechanism | Firstpost

Finance Minister P Chidambaram is likely to review the entire appeal-filing mechanism of the Income Tax department in view of concerns expressed by the Supreme Court recently over delays in revenue cases.

The Minister may review the mechanism in the middle of next month with senior officials of the Finance Ministry and the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). ?The Finance Minister is expected to review this work of the department shortly. Instructions have been issued to all field formations of the department to collect the data in this regard and ensure that there is no delay in the process (of filing timely appeals) henceforth,? a senior official said.

Moneycontrol.com

The CBDT, concerned over the adverse comments of various High Courts and the apex court on the ?inordinate delays and deficiencies in the filing of appeals (in courts)?, has also recently issued orders fixing a 21-day mandatory deadline for preparing a response in such cases by the tax department.

Cracking the whip, the CBDT had also mandated that any action of delay in filing of appeals in the High Courts or Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) in the apex court may attract ?administrative action?. ?The proposals for filing SLP are still received after considerable delay.

The proposal must reach the Directorate (of I-T Legal), complete in all respect, within 21 days of the date of judgement of the High Court.

The Commissioners of I-T are requested to monitor this aspect of the work closely. ?Excuses like heavy workload or officers on leave among others are not acceptable,? an official communique from the legal department of the I-T had said.

The communication had been sent to all field formations of the I-T engaged in tax assessment and collection. ?Delay in filing appeal in the High Court and in the submission of SLP proposal may attract administrative action,? the order drafted on the directions of the CBDT, the apex body of I-T department, had said.

The latest order, aimed to streamline such cases where huge tax revenue is stuck in various stages of litigation, mandates that timelines be ?strictly adhered? to. The Supreme Court had recently pulled up the I-T for inordinate delays in filing appeals.

Minister of State for Finance S S Palanimanickam had told Parliament recently that on the Direct Taxes side, 5,860 cases involving tax demand worth Rs 2,707 crore were pending in Supreme Court while 29,650 other cases with tax demand of Rs 36,340 crore were stuck in High Courts.

PTI

Source: http://www.firstpost.com/fwire/economy-fwire/fm-to-review-income-tax-depts-appeal-filing-mechanism-471098.html

patrice oneal shamrock slainte the quiet man yellow cab dropkick murphys guernsey

Your Health: Testing for prostate cancer - YNN - Your News Now

'); if(infobox=='True' && ShowInfoBox_l288537_1==false){ jQuery("#player_infobarl288537_1").trigger('click'); ShowInfoBox_l288537_1==true; } }; if (false) { $.setup_player(Play_Conf); } //info bar setup jQuery('#player_infobarl288537_1').click(function() { var $info =jQuery('#player_info_contentl288537_1'); if($info.text()!=''){ var $content = jQuery('div',$info); //min heigth var min = $content.css('min-height'); var max = $content.css('max-height'); $info.slideToggle(600); ShowInfoBox_l288537_1=!ShowInfoBox_l288537_1; } }); }); To view our videos, you need to
enable JavaScript. Learn how.
install Adobe Flash 9 or above. Install now.

Then come back here and refresh the page.

'Like a puppy mill': 39 emaciated horses rescued

By NBC News staff and wire reports

SEATTLE -- Animal control officers seized 39 emaciated and sickly horses from inhumane conditions in dark stalls filled with feces on a breeding farm outside of Tacoma on Wednesday, authorities said.

U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration agents discovered the malnourished animals, many injured and some standing in more than a foot of waste, while serving drug-related warrants on Tuesday at the 99-acre property in Graham, Washington, Pierce County Animal Control supervisor Brian Boman told Reuters.

Animal control officers and sheriff's deputies from Pierce and Kitsap counties returned to the ranch a day later to seize the animals and found many were highly skittish because they had been "stall-bound" in three dark barns, Boman said.

"It was like a puppy mill, only with horses," Boman told Reuters. "The conditions are terrible. There's no telling how long it's been since they've seen daylight."

Read the story on NBC's KING5.com

Pierce County auditor Julie Anderson told NBC station KING 5 that the horses had not been handled in a very long time. "They literally have their 'night eyes' on so they're very sun sensitive and are having trouble with depth perception," she said, describing?the scene as "wanton criminal neglect."

The horses were receiving veterinary care and were being held for the time being as evidence, KING 5 reported.

No-one has been arrested so far but the owners could face charges of animal cruelty in the second degree, a gross misdemeanor in the state of Washington.

KING 5 reported that an attorney for the owner said his client "loves these animals" and did not believe the conditions reached a criminal level.

'No lighting or ventilation'
Authorities spent more than nine hours rounding up the horses, which included mostly purebred Arabians as well as Belgian Draft horses and Clydesdales, to take them to nearby fairgrounds. None were race horses.

Some likely would be euthanized, Boman said.

A Pierce County Sheriff's Office news release, describing the roundup as the largest horse seizure the county had ever undertaken, cited the horses' living conditions as deplorable.

"Most of the horses were in barns that had large amounts of urine and feces in the stalls," the release said. "Some of the barns had no lighting or ventilation and the smell of ammonia was very strong."

Because federal and county criminal investigations are ongoing, federal authorities would not immediately release the name of the farm's owner, said Emily Langlie, spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney's Office in Seattle.

NBC News staff and Reuters contributed to this report.

More content from NBCNews.com:

Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

Source: http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/09/27/14120365-like-a-puppy-mill-dozens-of-emaciated-horses-rescued-from-washington-farm?lite

stephen hawking marion barry virginia beach jet crash ridiculously photogenic guy amanda bynes dui ghost ship tiger woods masters

Omidyar Network publishes ?Priming the Pump for Impact Investing? in

As the impact investing industry marks five years since the term ?impact investing? was coined, Omidyar Network has developed a series of six articles that highlight key issues and opportunities for the industry. Presented in partnership with Stanford Social Innovation Review, the online series, ?Priming the Pump for Impact Investing?, begins today and extends through October 2.

Omidyar Network makes the case for a fundamental shift from a firm-based to a sector-based approach to impact investing. By re-directing investments, re-evaluating the role of subsidies and policies, and re-examining returns across the investment continuum, we believe that impact investors can accelerate greater social and financial returns impacting millions of people worldwide.

Join Omidyar Network and the SOCAP?12 community in this dialogue about the approaches and ideas that can help prime the pump to spark, nurture and scale new sectors.

The first article in the series, ?Sectors, Not Just Firms,? can be read on the Stanford Social Innovation Review website.?

Join the conversation on Twitter by following #primingthepump.?

?

?

Source: http://socialcapitalmarkets.net/2012/09/26/omidyar-network-publishes-priming-the-pump-for-impact-investing-in-partnership-with-stanford-social-innovation-review/

jeff fisher van der sloot heather locklear mlk memorial mlk memorial heather locklear hospitalized joplin tornado

Instead of Discounting, Use the Three Options Strategy

Note: I wrote this piece a number of years ago and I am still receiving feedback from salespeople, sales managers, and senior executives that it works well in today?s environment, no matter what sales methodology they are using. ?In fact, ESR?s custom advisory services projects are always priced this way. ?Our clients really like this approach.


Last minute discounting has become so prevalent that many companies have come to depend on it as their default sales strategy. Employing a go-to-market strategy of being the lowest cost provider is one thing, but dramatic, tactical discounting on every deal will erode your company?s margins and leave you digging a deeper and deeper hole in which your company will ultimately bury itself.

I don?t want to give you the impression that discounting is never appropriate.? Here are three scenarios where it may be required:

  1. When a company has mispriced their offering.?Let?s face it.? Times have changed. Competition is fierce. And yes, as much as we don?t like to admit it, prices and fees have been forced down in some markets. If everyone else is now selling what you sell for $1.00 and you?re still selling it, just as you always have, for $2.00, and you can?t prove you can deliver a dollar?s worth of additional value for the customer, your pricing is too high?way too high. Call it a discount, or call it a price adjustment, in this situation you?ve got face reality and sell your products at a price the market will bear, or you won?t sell very much at all.
  2. As a token concession to close the deal. I don?t see a problem with ?rewarding? a buyer for signing an order within your required time frame, for example. Understand, I would much rather provide other concessions that don?t cost my company money and don?t educate my customer that whenever I am going to ask them for an order, I am going to give up part of my margin and commission. But I do live in the real world and understand that for my clients, pricing concessions are sometimes required to get the deal signed.
  3. When you haven?t done an adequate job of selling the unique business value your product or service will provide the customer. ?I am never happy hearing about situations like this, but if you?ve not done the best selling job, there is some room in your pricing model for a discount, and you need the deal, discounting may be better than losing the deal on principal.

Of course your risks are not only reducing margins to get this deal done, but you?ve educated the customer that they can get a discount when you are under the gun.

How do you avoid discounting?

To succeed in B2B sales today, you must sell business improvement, not products or services. That means differentiating yourself from your competition in the unique value you, your products and services, and your company can provide toward your customer achieving their corporate, divisional, business unit, department, or governmental agency goals.

Have you transitioned into the mode of creating customer demand by targeting accounts?getting in before they know they have a need, and establishing yourself as a knowledgeable, trusted, and patient advisor?? If not, you?ll continue to be on the receiving end of all sorts of one-sided customer demands, mostly taking the form of answering requests for information, doing presentations, demonstrations, free trials, fighting the constant battle against having your offering commoditized by the customer, and being on the receiving end of strong demands for discounts.

We?ve been taught over the years to bundle our products and services where possible to provide the customer with a single investment number. That way, we were told, they can?t nickel and dime you, and can?t slice up your offering, able to say no to pieces they don?t want or need.? But now times have changed and when you think about it, that?s exactly what you want to do.

If you sell products or services that can be componentized, sold in pieces or modules, or in phases, you?re potentially in good shape.

Scenario

You know your competition is going to come in with a substantial discount, as they have before. Your sales effort must include:

  • Assuring yourself that the customer is not making a decision solely or primarily on price. This question must be asked again and again of key decision makers throughout the process.
  • Getting agreement from the ?real buyer? that you understand their business objectives and that your offering can help them achieve those objectives. This method does not work unless you are dealing with the real buyer.
  • Finding unique areas of additional value (on top of their existing requirements) that you can provide through the capabilities of your product or service offering.
  • Management support for potentially selling part of your offering now, and the rest later on rather than selling the whole thing at a discounted price.

In cases where you know your competitors will be discounting, you?ll need to offer several investment options to your customer. Alan Weiss, ?the consultant?s consultant,? suggests providing three opportunities for them to say yes.

If you offer your prospect three options to buy?let?s say for the sake of labels, Platinum, Gold, and Silver?and you?ve done a good job of selling the business value of your offering?you can avoid having to concede more than a nominal discount.

Your plan here should be not to discount, but rather to back value out of your proposal to meet the prospect?s desired investment level. Presenting three options lets you do exactly that.? The customer gets to determine how much they want to invest and will enjoy the resulting ROI associated with that level of investment. ?Be advised that to do this most effectively, you?ll need some political, financial, and competitive selling skills.

Here is a template for the three options:

The Platinum Option

  • Gets the customer what they need (and want)
  • Highest level of investment.? You might ask for a 10-30% premium over the Gold level for this option, depending on the value you believe you can deliver to the customer.
  • All the features, modules, components, capabilities available
  • Your best resources
  • Quickest time to value
  • Priority service: As examples, a special 800 number (like the airline priority clubs), top of the queue, 24 x 7 x 365
  • The highest ROI (see graphic)
  • Other perks, such as quarterly meetings with your CEO, special invitation events, input into your product development plans

The Gold Option

  • Gets the customer all of what they need (and a few wants)
  • Budgeted level of investment. This is aimed right at the prospect?s budget level.
  • Most/many of the features, modules, components, capabilities
  • Proven, talented and dependable resources
  • Quick time to value
  • An attractive ROI
  • Other perks, such as quarterly meetings with your VP of Service, special invitation events

When your prospect tells you your competition has come in with a very low price, you can calmly?discuss with them the fact that they have an option (the Silver option) that will provide them with what they need at a competitive price. You will already have differentiated yourself from the competition in a number of areas: understanding the customer?s business, industry, opportunities, challenges, competitive and customer pressures, and built rapport with the real buyer. In addition, you?ve professionally educated your prospect on the risks that befall companies who depend on tactical discounting to win.

The Silver Option

  • Gets the customer most of what they need now, and the rest in ?phase two,? next quarter or next year, for example
  • The lowest level of investment, aimed 10-30% below the Gold level, depending on how severe a discount the competition is going to offer
  • Some of your total array of features, modules, components, capabilities.? The rest can be acquired later.
  • Talented and dependable resources
  • Reasonable time to value
  • An ROI that meets their corporate requirements

What will the customer do? The may tell you they want your Platinum option at the Silver price. If you?ve done an effective job selling the business value of your product or service and built a relationship with the real buyer based upon trust, you can look them in they eye and tell them it just isn?t possible. What will they do then? According to our clients, more often than not, the customer will go for the Gold or Platinum option.

? 2012?? Dave Stein?? All Rights Reserved

Photo credit:?? Olena Pantiukh ? Fotolia.com

-->

Source: http://davesteinsblog.esresearch.com/2012/09/26/instead-of-discounting-use-the-three-options-strategy/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=instead-of-discounting-use-the-three-options-strategy

adrienne rich cesar chavez day raspberry ketone ron burgundy millennial media nit championship transcendentalism

Republicans: DHS ?attempting to conceal information from the American people? about immigrant welfare policies

Four powerful Republican senators are demanding answers to questions they posited to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano in early August regarding the apparent watering down of immigration regulations which prohibit those seeking residency or citizenship from being primarily reliant on welfare, or a public charge.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) missed the Aug. 20 deadline and has yet to respond. Also addressed in the initial letter was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The State Department did respond, claiming that the majority of the inquiry fell under the purview of DHS.

In a letter?sent to Napolitano Tuesday, and obtained by The Daily Caller, the ranking members of the Senate Finance, Agriculture, Budget, and Judiciary Committees ?- Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch, Kansas Republican Sen. Pat Roberts, Alabama Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions and Iowa Republican Chuck Grassley respectively ? requested answers to their initial questions, specifically pertaining to why participation in a majority of welfare programs fails to disqualify immigrants who apply for admission or status adjustments.

?Your failure to respond to our oversight request is deeply troubling, and suggests that your Department is attempting to conceal information from the American people,? the senators wrote.

The four demanded that the Department offer all the data they requested back on Aug. 6 ? an explanation about how the watered down approach fits congressional intent, the number of aliens denied admittance due to being a dependency risk, the number that became a public charge once admitted, the number admitted even though they were a dependency risk because the applicant offered an affidavit of support, and if the answers are unavailable, why the agencies do not track the data.

In their most recent letter, the senators also ask for the number of applications received each year.

A GOP senate staffer noted to TheDC that the information should be readily available and easy to provide.

?It has long been a sound principle of immigration law that those who seek citizenship in this country ought to be financially self-sufficient,? the senators wrote in their initial Aug. 6 request. ?We were thus shocked to discover that both the State Department and DHS exclude reliance on almost all governmental welfare programs when evaluating whether an alien is likely to become a public charge. Your agencies apply a cramped interpretation of the law in this regard, considering reliance on only two of nearly 80 federal welfare programs as evidence of likelihood of becoming a public charge: Supplemental Social Security Income (SSI) and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF).?

They further noted that agency guidelines prohibit consideration of food stamp benefits, Medicaid, child-care benefits, energy assistance, WIC payments, educational assistance and more when analyzing applications for citizenship and status changes.

?Indeed, under your interpretation, an able-bodied immigrant of working age could receive the bulk of his or her income in the form of federal welfare and still not be deemed a ?public charge,?? they wrote on Aug. 6.

The State Department did not offer an explanation of the approach but did offer a response to two of the data requests, in a response to the senators Sept. 17.

According to the letter from the State Department ? obtained by TheDC ? from 2001 to 2011 118,004 immigrants and 11,233 nonimmigrants, or those seeking temporary admission, were denied visas based on INA 212 (a)(4), the regulation which prohibits admission of aliens likely to ?at any time become a public charge.?

Of the 118,004 immigrant visa applications denied under the regulation, 113,087 were able to overcome the ineligibility finding and obtain visas based on an affidavit of support by a sponsor. Of the 11,233 nonimmigrants denied based on the public charge risk, 1,974 were granted a visa based on an affidavit of support.

Follow Caroline on Twitter
Join the conversation on The Daily Caller

Read more stories from The Daily Caller

Deer repeatedly defaces Obama yard sign [VIDEO]

10 of the worst calls in sports history [VIDEO]

Report: Climate change is not a national security threat

Benghazi terrorists slew, Obama knew

Don't call 911 if your daughter won't buy you beer unless you want to get arrested

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/republicans-dhs-attempting-conceal-information-american-people-immigrant-154808329.html

mike brown jacoby ellsbury jacoby ellsbury morosini death kenny rogers avatar the last airbender david wright

Brady says replacement officials doing their best

New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady looks on after not being able to convert for a first down in the second half of an NFL football game against the Baltimore Ravens in Baltimore, Sunday, Sept. 23, 2012. Baltimore won 31-30. (AP Photo/Gail Burton)

New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady looks on after not being able to convert for a first down in the second half of an NFL football game against the Baltimore Ravens in Baltimore, Sunday, Sept. 23, 2012. Baltimore won 31-30. (AP Photo/Gail Burton)

New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady (12) is sacked by Baltimore Ravens linebacker Dannell Ellerbe (59) in the first half of an NFL football game in Baltimore, Sunday, Sept. 23, 2012. Also pictured tackling Brady is Ravens linebacker Courtney Upshaw. (AP Photo/Nick Wass)

(AP) ? Tom Brady says replacement officials are doing their best and are not the reason for the outcomes of any of the Patriots' games.

New England's quarterback also said Tuesday he didn't see the call Monday night that resulted in Seattle's 14-12 victory over the Packers. Golden Tate was awarded a touchdown on a pass he and Green Bay's M.D. Jennings wrestled for in the end zone. The Packers said it should have been ruled an interception.

Brady said on WEEI radio that part of his job is not to worry about officials.

The Patriots (1-2) lost Sunday night to the Baltimore Ravens 31-30, a game decided by a last-play field goal. Coach Bill Belichick grabbed an official's arm while leaving the field. He later said he was trying to find out if the play was reviewable.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/347875155d53465d95cec892aeb06419/Article_2012-09-25-Patriots-Brady/id-9b172557ca704e3da84434135b093ddf

patriots vs giants super bowl superbowl halftime show papa johns guacamole recipe jason wu for target underwood buffalo wings